Bruce Montague
Bill C-68 Court Challenge
CCF Takes Montague Case | News | Sign-Up for email-updates | donate Donate
Online
This Case Epilogue written February 1, 2017 is intended to provide context to this web site as it documents a Canadian constitutional challenge spanning from 2004 to 2016. Bruce Montague determined to expose the constitutional violations in the Canadian Firearms Act. After being charged, mounting a constitutional challenge and appealing to the Supreme Court of Canada, Montague's case was dismissed without reasons. With Bruce in jail, the Montagues then faced an another twist of injustice -- the confiscation of their home and property by the Ontario government. The Montagues fought the civil forfeiture of their home for years until, in the summer of 2016, the Canadian Constitution Foundation was instrumental in negotiating with the Ontario Civil Forfeiture department to drop the lien against the Montague home. The Canadian Constitution Foundation deserves our support as they continue to fight other cases of injustice around the country. YOU COULD BE NEXT! Canada is undergoing a quiet revolution and your fundamental rights and freedoms are at stake!
What's Wrong with Civil Forfeiture» | Write to Stop Civil Forfeiture»

About
YouTube
News Archive
Testimonials
Rationale
Quotes
Letters
Editorials
Audio/Video
Photos

Volunteer
Donate
Advertise
Write

Donors
Contact
Links
F.A.Q.
Search
Site Map

Mar12: Daily Court Reports

News Archive Index

March 12-20, 2007 Court Hearings

Court begins 10:00 AM daily at the Superior Court of Ontario, 216 Water Street, Kenora Ontario.

March 12 - Today's hearing was delayed due to an extended sentencing hearing. By the time everyone was searched and entered the court, it was well after 3:30 PM. The Crown, Mr. Peter Keen challenged our two main expert witnesses on the grounds that their testimony is opinion which is based on unqualified facts. We'll proceed tomorrow at 10:00 AM with evidence to the contrary.

March 13 - Today court started on time at 10:00 AM. As anticipated we spent the whole day dealing with submissions from Mr. Martin and Mr. Keen regarding the admissibility of evidence from Dr. Gary Mauser. Mr. Keen had lots of arguments to show that the judge should not accept Dr. Mauser's evidence, including consideration of the reliability, relevance and expert status of the evidence. Court resumes at 10:00 AM tomorrow.

March 14 - Court resumed at 10:00 AM. First off judge Wright agreed to extend the hearings into next week in order to provide sufficient time to deal with the constitutional issues. We spent the whole morning working through Mr. Keen's further arguments to dismiss the expert evidence of Professor Mauser. This afternoon Calvin Martin made a final submission susbstantiating Professor Mauser's expert status, and we began working through issues of David Tomlinson's admissibility as an expert witness.

March 15 - Today the court finally finished hearing submissions by the crown to discredit our expert witnesses. Calvin Martin then pointed out some discrepancies in the crown's critique of Mr. Tomlinson's analysis of the Firearms Control regulations. Late in the afternoon we moved onto submissions regarding the affidavits of the crown witnesses. The judge will decide which material from the expert witnesses should be admissible. Court is cancelled tomorrow, and resumes on Monday at 10:00 AM when we hope to begin presenting constitutional arguments.

March 19 - Court was delayed due to a snow storm. Justice Wright delivered his decision about expert witnesses, declaring Dr. Gary Mauser's evidence admissible if it's shown to be relevant, and Dave Tomlinson's inadmissiable because he's a biased advocate for the firearms cause. Calvin began his arguments before we finished for the day about 5:00 PM.

March 20 - Tuesday's proceedings dealt with arranging an ajournment. Read more about it in this news report: Court Proceedings Delayed »


back to top | search | home | site map
DISCLAIMER: BruceMontague.ca is maintained by friends and supporters of Bruce Montague.
It is NOT an official mouth-piece for Bruce Montague's legal defense.