Bruce Montague
Bill C-68 Court Challenge
CCF Takes Montague Case | News | Sign-Up for email-updates | donate Donate
This Case Epilogue written February 1, 2017 is intended to provide context to this web site as it documents a Canadian constitutional challenge spanning from 2004 to 2016. Bruce Montague determined to expose the constitutional violations in the Canadian Firearms Act. After being charged, mounting a constitutional challenge and appealing to the Supreme Court of Canada, Montague's case was dismissed without reasons. With Bruce in jail, the Montagues then faced an another twist of injustice -- the confiscation of their home and property by the Ontario government. The Montagues fought the civil forfeiture of their home for years until, in the summer of 2016, the Canadian Constitution Foundation was instrumental in negotiating with the Ontario Civil Forfeiture department to drop the lien against the Montague home. The Canadian Constitution Foundation deserves our support as they continue to fight other cases of injustice around the country. YOU COULD BE NEXT! Canada is undergoing a quiet revolution and your fundamental rights and freedoms are at stake!
What's Wrong with Civil Forfeiture» | Write to Stop Civil Forfeiture»

News Archive


Site Map

Nov23: Government led terrorism, then and now.

Letters Index
Source: The Dryden Observer

Published in the Dryden Observer. Nov. 23, 2005.

To the editor,

November 9 was the 67th anniversary of Kristallnacht, the night of the broken glass, when Nazi troops and civilians tried to destroy all Jewish properties in Germany and Austria. The night is recognized as the beginning of the Holocaust. November 11 is the day we honour people who died fighting tyranny and terrorism in various ways.

On October 5, our government took their first steps in court to seize Bruce and Donna Montague’s house. Is this any less terrorism and tyranny?

I believe the reason the government took this action before any criminal charges were dealt with is simply to terrorize the Montague’s in an attempt to force them to make a plea bargain with the crown. The law that they applied in this case was passed to combat organized crime. I think that the government’s use of it against this family is reprehensible. Any adult that thinks about this case should be scared of the government’s power. Can you imagine what young Katey Montague thinks of this? How did Bruce and Donna tell their 13-year-old that the government can take the log home that the family worked on for six years?

The latest polls indicate that the fiberals may win an election in the New Year. If they do they will make the R.C.M.P. and the crown attorneys spend millions of their tax dollars grinding the Montague’s down. If they’re going to fight dirty they should leave the women and children out of it.




back to top | search | home | site map
DISCLAIMER: is maintained by friends and supporters of Bruce Montague.
It is NOT an official mouth-piece for Bruce Montague's legal defense.