Bruce Montague
Bill C-68 Court Challenge
CCF Takes Montague Case | News | Sign-Up for email-updates | donate Donate
This Case Epilogue written February 1, 2017 is intended to provide context to this web site as it documents a Canadian constitutional challenge spanning from 2004 to 2016. Bruce Montague determined to expose the constitutional violations in the Canadian Firearms Act. After being charged, mounting a constitutional challenge and appealing to the Supreme Court of Canada, Montague's case was dismissed without reasons. With Bruce in jail, the Montagues then faced an another twist of injustice -- the confiscation of their home and property by the Ontario government. The Montagues fought the civil forfeiture of their home for years until, in the summer of 2016, the Canadian Constitution Foundation was instrumental in negotiating with the Ontario Civil Forfeiture department to drop the lien against the Montague home. The Canadian Constitution Foundation deserves our support as they continue to fight other cases of injustice around the country. YOU COULD BE NEXT! Canada is undergoing a quiet revolution and your fundamental rights and freedoms are at stake!
What's Wrong with Civil Forfeiture» | Write to Stop Civil Forfeiture»

News Archive


Site Map

Oct17: Montague sheds clothes to make a point

News Archive Index
Source: Kenora Daily Miner and News

Police met with Full Monty

By Dan Gauthier
Kenora Daily Miner and News
Tuesday October 17, 2006

Firearms activist Bruce Montague made a bold statement Monday to protest the strict security measures taken by police on himself and everyone entering the courtroom.

When asked to subject to a weapons search prior to entering his Charter of Rights and Freedoms hearing in Kenora Superior Court, Montague saved the Ontario Provincial Police security detail the trouble by stripping off his clothes.

“He left his briefs on,” said one of the officers stationed at the courtroom doors, armed with metal-detecting wands.

Montague said he was trying to make a statement with the move that the added security was not necessary.

“It was getting pretty indignant,” said Montague of the security measures.

“The fact that they were going through all these hurdles for me,” he added. “That’s pretty humiliating to be put through.”

Montague said, thankfully, the police didn’t escort him into the courtroom like they had in past appearances. There were, however, two plain-clothed OPP officers sitting in the body of the court for added security.

Crown attorney Peter Keen said it is the police who are in charge of security at the courthouse, but these types of precautions are not unusual.

“In courts throughout the province, measures like these are routine,” said Keen.


back to top | search | home | site map
DISCLAIMER: is maintained by friends and supporters of Bruce Montague.
It is NOT an official mouth-piece for Bruce Montague's legal defense.